0人評分過此書

Deprivation of Liberty in the Shadows of the Institution

出版社
出版日期
2022/03/29
閱讀格式
EPUB
書籍分類
學科分類
ISBN
9781529212013

本館館藏

借閱規則
當前可使用人數 30
借閱天數 14
線上看 0
借閱中 0
選擇分享方式

推薦本館採購書籍

您可以將喜歡的電子書推薦給圖書館,圖書館會參考讀者意見進行採購

讀者資料
圖書館
* 姓名
* 身分
系所
* E-mail
※ 我們會寄送一份副本至您填寫的Email中
電話
※ 電話格式為 區碼+電話號碼(ex. 0229235151)/ 手機格式為 0900111111
* 請輸入驗證碼
ePDF and ePUB available Open Access under CC-BY-NC licence. During the 20th century the locus of care shifted from large institutions into the community. However, this shift was not always accompanied by liberation from restrictive practices. In 2014 a UK Supreme Court ruling on the meaning of ‘deprivation of liberty’ resulted in large numbers of older and disabled people in care homes, supported living and family homes being re-categorized as ‘detained’. Placing this ruling in its social, historical and global context, this book presents a socio-legal analysis of social care detention in the post-carceral era. Drawing from disability rights law and the meanings of ‘home’ and ‘institution’ it proposes solutions to the Cheshire West ruling’s paradoxical implications.
  • Cover
  • Series Page
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Dedication
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover Description
  • List of Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
  • A Note on Terminology
  • Series Editor’s Preface
  • 1 Introduction
    • Social care detention: a post-carceral socio-legal phenomenon
    • Regulating the ‘invisible asylum’
    • About this book
    • A note on the COVID-19 pandemic
  • 2 Distinguishing Social Care Detention
    • Locus
    • Regulatory form
    • Target populations
    • Problems, rationalities and legal technologies
      • Elongated temporality
      • Legal technologies
      • Empowerment and vulnerability
      • Professionals and expertise
      • The role of families
  • 3 The Law of Institutions
    • The law of institutions: a landscape sketch
    • Regulating the ‘trade in lunacy’
    • Lunacy (law) reform
    • Frontiers of resistance
      • Domestic psychiatry
      • Non-restraint
    • Partitioning populations
      • ‘Idiots’ and ‘senile dements’ within lunacy law
      • Workhouse ‘care’
      • Idiots asylums
      • Mental deficiency colonies
  • 4 The Post-carceral Landscape of Care
    • Ideologies and reformers
      • Scandals
      • Sociological critique
      • ‘Independent living’ and disability rights
      • Opposition to psychiatry
      • Normalization
      • Person-centred care
    • First-wave deinstitutionalization: from medical to social care
      • From workhouses to ‘sunshine hotels’
      • Marketization and ‘personalization’
      • ‘Homes not hospitals’
    • Second-wave deinstitutionalization
      • Supported living and supported decision making
      • Deinstitutionalizing older people?
    • The institutional treadmill
    • Family-based care
  • 5 Social Care Detention in Human Rights Law
    • Human rights at the end of the carceral era
    • The post-carceral turn in international human rights law
    • Recognizing social care detention in human rights law
      • Social care detention under the ECHR
      • Monitoring social care detention
    • Abolitionist human rights
      • Social care detention and abolitionist human rights
  • 6 Institution/Home
    • Home as territory
      • Choice and control over everyday life
      • Loss of privacy
      • Control of the threshold
      • Home as territory in liminal spaces of care
    • Home as a centre for self-identity
    • Home as a social and cultural unit
      • Homes, institutions and families
      • Batch living
      • Access, inclusion and belonging in community
    • The aesthetics of home and institutions
    • Liminal places, contested spaces
    • Regulating the micro?
  • 7 Regulatory Tremors
    • To ‘informality’ and back again
    • Regulating the community
      • Defining institutions
      • Taming institutions
    • Care and capacity law
      • The ‘non-volitional’
      • The new capacity jurisdiction
      • Bournewood: the challenge to informality
      • The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards
  • 8 The Acid Test
    • MIG, MEG and P
      • MIG and MEG: reported facts
      • P: reported facts
    • The contours of liberty before Cheshire West
      • Deprivation of liberty as removal from the family and home
      • Family life as freedom
      • ‘Normality’ and the comparator
      • Benevolence: reasons, motivation, purpose
      • ‘Objections’ and ambiguity
    • Cheshire West in the Supreme Court
      • The acid test
      • Benevolence
      • Objections
      • The reverse-comparator: universal human rights
      • Dissolving the home/institution boundary
    • Responses and backlash
      • A victory for human rights?
      • Judicial resistance
      • Libertarian backlash
      • A statutory definition?
      • Tremors
  • 9 Aftermath
    • A broken system
    • The Liberty Protection Safeguards
      • Reconceptualizing ‘deprivation of liberty’ safeguards?
      • Three core assessments
      • Rationing safeguards
    • Aftershocks
      • ‘Domestic’ deprivation of liberty
      • Children
      • Medical treatment
  • 10 ‘Protecting the Vulnerable’
    • Vulnerability and domination
    • Social care as a landscape of domination
    • Care-professional legalism
    • Alternative regulatory strategies
      • ‘Substituted consent’, guardianship and adult protection laws
      • Second opinion schemes
      • Regulating ‘restrictive practices’
      • Visiting commissions and inspectorates
    • ‘New paradigm’ safeguards?
  • 11 Out of the Shadows of the Institution?
    • The problem-spaces of social care detention
    • Beyond the gilded cage?
  • References
  • Index

評分與評論

請登入後再留言與評分
幫助
您好,請問需要甚麼幫助呢?
使用指南

客服專線:0800-000-747

服務時間:週一至週五 AM 09:00~PM 06:00

loading